Financial tasks usually capture our attention when there is an immediate, short-term need such as paying a bill that has come due. If we have established routines for managing our finances, it’s especially easy for us to continue down those paths without much thought. In fact, most of us are not making a deliberate choice not to use digital financial services – those opportunities for usage simply never make it into our line of sight. The attention challenge is even more pronounced in a digital environment where physical cues and human interaction are limited, and an increasing number of digital products and services compete for visibility. Finding specific moments that align with a real-world need can help bring digital financial tools to the forefront of our attention and increase engagement.
Design Principle 1:
Align with a moment of need
Design Principle 2:
Reminders and alerts need to be “smart”
Design Principle 3:
Interrupt the habit and redirect attention
Design Principle 4:
Incorporate the human element
People tend to notice and respond to one aspect of their environment at a time. We automatically pay attention to what stands out – not necessarily what’s most important. As a result, we can completely miss critical information or even physical objects that are right in front of us.
Dive deeperOur ability to pay attention to several things at once is much more limited than we might think. This means that when our attentional capacity is stretched – for instance, when we are driving, listening to music, and texting all at once – we are left effectively blind to information we would easily notice under normal circumstances. Have you ever missed a highway exit and sworn there was no sign for it? Have you ever been admonished by a bureaucrat from forgetting to sign a form? If so, you have experienced limited attention. Do you think you can manage to carefully pay attention to two or three things at the same time?
If you do, then take a look at this video!
In this famous example, participants watched a video of two teams – one in white shorts and one in black shorts – passing a basketball. The participants were tasked with counting only the number of passes by the team in white shorts. While the participants are closely counting the number of passes, a woman in a gorilla suit walks to the center of the court, beats her chest, and exits. Remarkably, of the thousands of people who have now seen this video, only half notice the “gorilla”; and those that don’t notice are sure they didn’t miss anything.
When we design products and programs, we assume that if people don’t choose them, then they must not want them. Often, though, people simply didn’t notice what we put in front of them. Even if we get that people have limited attention, it’s hard to fathom how very limited it is. We may send a single email and then give up if people don’t respond. Or, we often put a large amount of information in front of people and expect that they’ll see all of it. Once we realize that attention is extremely limited and fleeting, we can design our products, programs or messages in a way that they can’t be missed. Making them visually prominent is one way to do this, as is exposing people to them multiple times. There are also subtler ways such as presenting them at times when people may be more likely to pay attention. You might be much more likely to pay attention to advice about healthy eating if you got it during your annual physical, than if your doctor’s office sent you a flyer several weeks later. Not only are you not focused on your health later, but that email or envelope is likely to be buried in a firehose of other communications.
Radiologists were asked to find medical abnormalities on CT scans. Focused on this task, 83% failed to spot an image of a gorilla on the scans, proving how limited attentional capacity can be. Drew, T., Võ, M. L. H., & Wolfe, J. M. (2013). The invisible gorilla strikes again: Sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers. Psychological science, 24(9), 1848-1853. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613479386
Researchers demonstrate that the context of poverty causes people to engage more deeply in some problems while neglecting others, explaining why people may take on very costly debts to cover immediate needs despite future consequences. Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2012). Some consequences of having too little. Science, 338(6107), 682-685. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/sendhil/files/some_consequences_of_having_too_little.pdf
Consumers aren’t necessarily scanning the marketplace for new solutions, even if there are faster, more convenient options out there. To enter a consumer’s consideration set, find a moment when they are looking to meet a specific need, and make sure your product breaks into their line of sight and facilitates positive action within that moment. Of course, that needs to be a moment when they have sufficient time – and mental bandwidth – to complete the action successfully.
This example does not constitute or imply an endorsement or recommendation of any product or service by ideas42.
This example does not constitute or imply an endorsement or recommendation of any product or service by ideas42.
Researchers explain the economics of prize-linked savings from the perspective of financial institutions and the perspective of depositors. Guillén, M. F., & Tschoegl, A. E. (2002). Banking on gambling: Banks and lottery-linked deposit accounts. Journal of Financial Services Research, 21(3), 219-231.
People tend to believe that they should take advantage of opportunities that few others have. By framing opportunities as unique and exclusive, researchers increased people’s willingness to volunteer their time and make purchases. Burger, J. M., & Caldwell, D. F. (2011). When opportunity knocks: The effect of a perceived unique opportunity on compliance. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 671-680.
As financial management moves into a digital environment, the loss of physical cues or in-person interactions makes it easier to overlook financial tasks. Leveraging features such as real-time notifications and reminders has been shown to keep finances top of mind and boost financial health. However, these features must be well-timed, vivid and well-structured: grabbing people’s attention at the moment when they can take action, and ideally providing a channel to complete the action
Getting it right:
Caution!
A prompt to wear your seatbelt delivered 30 seconds before the opportunity increased seatbelt use, but a prompt delivered 5 minutes before did not. Austin, J., Sigurdsson, S. O., & Rubin, Y. S. (2006). An examination of the effects of delayed versus immediate prompts on safety belt use. Environment and behavior, 38(1), 140-149.
Researchers sent monthly text messages to bank customers who had made commitments to save. They found that reminding people of the specific purchase they were saving for helped people stick to savings goals. Karlan, D., McConnell, M., Mullainathan, S., & Zinman, J. (2016). Getting to the top of mind: How reminders increase saving. Management Science, 62(12), 3393-3411.
Sometimes, we like things the way they are simply because that’s the way things are. There are many reasons for this. We disproportionately value things we have over things we don’t have, a phenomenon that psychologists call the endowment effect. We also like to be internally consistent. Since making a switch would imply that previous decisions weren’t the right choice, we’ll avoid the change to avoid facing that inconsistency. And because we tend to overestimate the costs of switching, sticking with the current state of affairs feels easier than switching to something new, even when there are better options out there.
Dive Deeper“There’s no place like home.”
This memorable quote from The Wizard of Oz sums up how many of us feel about home – it’s comfortable and familiar. But beyond the physical place, we often unconsciously consider other things “home” too, such as beliefs, previous choices, and set routines. These things form an individual’s status quo, which we tend to prefer to stick to. As a result, we often “choose” pre-set options even when many other options are available.
Even arbitrary options that set the status quo – for example, default settings – play incredibly important roles in decision-making, and can influence what people choose and what eventually happens. One of the many studies on these effects gave people a hypothetical inheritance from a great-uncle and asked them whether they would like to invest in a moderate-risk company, a high risk company, treasury bills or municipal bonds. For different groups researchers told people that a significant portion of the inheritance was already invested in one of the options, effectively setting an arbitrary status quo. Even though there were no costs to switching away from the randomly set status quo option, it increased in popularity well beyond the personal preferences of the individuals.
If we want people to be able to make unbiased choices, we must be careful not to set one option as the status quo. If there is already a status quo, we need to recognize that people will be less likely to switch to an alternative even if they would have chosen it in the absence of the status quo.
For an explanation of the status quo bias and a review of evidence, see Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic perspectives, 5(1), 193-206.
We sometimes use regular routines to manage our finances, such as going to the bank at lunchtime every Friday. Even when there are better alternatives out there, we tend to automatically stick with what we know and overweight the cost of switching to something new. Interrupting old habits provides an opportunity to reset the user experience and introduce digital financial services that can save users time and/or money while better supporting financial health.
Getting it right:
Caution!
For a theoretical framework of how the status quo bias and habits affect technology acceptance, see Polites, G. L., & Karahanna, E. (2012). Shackled to the status quo: the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS quarterly, 21-42.
Researchers explain how habits are tied to environmental cues and present strategies for changing habitual behavior, such as fielding downstream interventions when there are natural shifts in lifestyle and upstream interventions when policies can change the context. Verplanken, B., & Wood, W. (2006). Interventions to break and create consumer habits. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 90-103.
People tend to reciprocate positive social gestures. In fact, we will often go out of our way to return a small favor. Research suggests that while we’re especially sensitive to this dynamic within established relationships, the impulse to reciprocate still holds when we interact with complete strangers.
Dive DeeperWhen a stranger in an elevator says hello, many of us can’t help but return the greeting. We tip more generously when servers are friendly, buy more products when we receive free samples, and are more likely to comply with requests when others do us a favor first.
Deeply ingrained norms of fairness and obligation drive this reciprocal impulse to reward kindness and punish unkindness. We often respond to social gestures even when we need to go out of our way do so and even when we’re interacting with complete strangers.
Researchers tested the impact of reciprocal behavior on charitable giving in a direct-mail fundraising campaign by sending small gifts with donation letters. Households either received a plain letter asking for donations, a letter accompanied by a small gift of one postcard and envelope, or a letter with a large gift of four postcards and envelopes. Those who received a small gift donated at a rate 17% higher than those who received a plain letter. The reciprocal response was even more pronounced for those who received a large gift. This group donated at a rate 75% higher than those who did not receive a gift at all.
By extending small acts of kindness such as a gift, personal favor, or extra attention or service, we establish a reciprocal relationship that supports positive exchanges.
Researchers present a formal theory of reciprocity that takes underlying intentions into account. Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and economic behavior, 54(2), 293-315.
Researchers sent text message reminders for loan repayments to borrowers of three banks in the Philippines. Repayment rates improved when borrowers knew the loan officer and messages included his or her name. Karlan, D., Morten, M., & Zinman, J. (2012). A personal touch: Text messaging for loan repayment (No. w17952). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Researchers found that a small gift elicits a reciprocal response among philanthropic donors and boosts the likelihood of making a charitable contribution by as much as 75%. Falk, A. (2007). Gift exchange in the field. Econometrica, 75(5), 1501-1511.
This book outlines fundamental principles of persuasion. Cialdini, R. B., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (pp. 173-174). New York: Collins.
We may not notice generic communications, but when it seems like someone put extra effort into reaching out, or when we know that someone is waiting for our reply, we’re more likely to pay attention and respond. Even if we don’t know the sender personally, including visuals like a photograph or personal details can invoke a response.
This example does not constitute or imply an endorsement or recommendation of any product or service by ideas42.
Getting it right:
Caution!
Adding the person’s name to an otherwise generic text message significantly increased the amount of money paid toward delinquent fines. Haynes, L. C., Green, D. P., Gallagher, R., John, P., & Torgerson, D. J. (2013). Collection of delinquent fines: An adaptive randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of alternative text messages. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(4), 718-730.
A hand-written note on a post-it note generated a 76% response rate, compared to a 36% response rate on a generic request. Garner, R. (2005). Post‐It® Note Persuasion: A Sticky Influence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(3), 230-237.
Borrowers who receive regular calls and high-touch service display better repayment behavior and greater customer satisfaction than borrowers who are not contacted or contacted only when payments are late. Schoar, A. (2012). The personal side of relationship banking.
Researchers sent text message reminders for loan repayments to borrowers of three banks in the Philippines. Repayment rates improved when borrowers knew the loan officer and messages included his or her name. Karlan, D., Morten, M., & Zinman, J. (2012). A personal touch: Text messaging for loan repayment (No. w17952). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Researchers found that users were more likely to provide their personal contact information when a website provided content and then asked for the information, rather than asking for the information first. Gamberini, L., Petrucci, G., Spoto, A., & Spagnolli, A. (2007, April). Embedded persuasive strategies to obtain visitors’ data: Comparing reward and reciprocity in an amateur, knowledge-based website. In International Conference on Persuasive Technology (pp. 187-198). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Design Principle 1:
Align with a moment of need
Design Principle 2:
Reminders and alerts need to be “smart”
Design Principle 3:
Interrupt the habit and redirect attention
Design Principle 4:
Incorporate the human element
Finding specific moments that align with a real-world need can help bring digital financial tools to the forefront of our attention when physical cues and human interaction are limited
Reminders are most effective when they grab people’s attention at the moment when they can take action
A personal touch has been shown to increase response rates and help people stay on top of their finances
Schoar, Antoinette. 2012. “The Personal Side of Relationship Banking.”
Stay updated with the
latest news straight from
ideas42.
Copyright 2019 © All Rights Reserved
This link will direct you to one of our partner sites